Evaluation

		*Online Evaluation*

03/15/10

If you did not already complete an evaluation of the sessions and this event at the conference, please tell us what you think about its success. We welcome all of your constructive comments and suggestions.

Please rate the sessions on a 1-5 scale
1 = Strongly Agree
2 = Slightly Agree
3 = No opinion
4 = Slightly Disagree
5 = Strongly Disagree

I attended the following sessions (select only one topic per session below):

If you did not attend Session I, skip to Session II, Session III, or Session IV

Session I

1. The information presented gave me a better understanding of this subject.

2. Speaker was knowledgeable about subject presented.

3. Speaker allowed time for questioning.

4. Speaker was organized.

5. Handout/demonstrations helped to understand the material presented.

6. Additional comments:

If you did not attend Session II, skip to Session III or Session IV

Session II
1. The information presented gave me a better understanding of this subject.

2. Speaker was knowledgeable about subject presented.

3. Speaker allowed time for questioning.

4. Speaker was organized.

5. Handout/demonstrations helped to understand material presented.

6. Additional comments:

Session III

1. The information presented gave me a better understanding of this subject.

2. Speaker was knowledgeable about subject presented.

3. Speaker allowed time for questioning.

4. Speaker was organized.

5. Handout/demonstrations helped to understand material presented.

6. Additional comments:

Session IV

1. The information presented gave me a better understanding of this subject.

2. Speaker was knowledgeable about subject presented.

3. Speaker allowed time for questioning.

4. Speaker was organized.

5. Handout/demonstrations helped to understand material presented.

6. Additional comments:

Keynote addresses:

Bob Ash was excellent! (Wednesday Keynote)

Mary Margaret Anderson was excellent (Ending Thurs. Keynote)

James Wedgewood was excellent! (Thursday Keynote)

Overall, did you feel the event was well-planned and organized?
Yes no
If your answer was no, how would you suggest we improve it?

Do you have suggestions for future staff development sessions or recommendations for particular speakers?

If you wish further contact, tell me how to get in touch with you:

Name
E-mail
Tel
FAX

Comments about the conference overall:

The Web Site was easy to use and navigate.

The registration process was easy to use.

The amount of food served was just right.

The quality of the food served was good.

The food selection was good.

Central Lakes College was a good location for the conference.

Central Lakes provided adequate signage for the conference.

The number/type of sessions offered was adequate.

Enough time was allowed between sessions.

The sessions offered were relevant to my job.

The format (2-one-half days) of the conference was great!

The conference overall was awesome!

Contact WebMaster with your comments.

This site was last updated 03/15/10