English
2235:
American Literature II: 1865 to the Present
Spring 2001 / Section 1
Essay #2 / Option #1
Write
an essay of 3-4 pages (900-1200 words) in which you do a close reading and
analysis of one of the texts we’ve read from the spring break up to the
end of the semester—i.e. Elizabeth Bishop through Louise Erdrich.
Please do not do research as you write your essay—work closely with
the text itself.
Begin
by picking a text that you really liked, or one that really intrigued you for
some reason. Then, read it again
and really start to think about what the author “does” and why
he or she did it that way. For
example, you might look at Carver’s “Cathedral,” and wonder if the
narrator’s character really undergoes any sort of change.
Read carefully and take notes on the importance scenes.
Decide whether or not you believe that he changes.
Speculate! Theorize!
Hypothesize! Try to come up
with a reason (or several possible reasons) to explain your observation and then
look back to the text for “evidence” (scenes, dialogue, description, etc.)
to support your views.
You can pick a text and a “line of analysis” on your own, you might use one of the following suggestions, or you might consider one of the following suggestions as a “jumping off point,” leading you to something you might not have thought of initially. Just limit yourself to the authors we’ve read since the spring break.
Essay
#2 / Option #2
Write
an essay of 3-4 pages (900-1200 words) in which you analyze and evaluate your
preferences for literature based on the entire reading list for this course for
this semester. Please do not
do research as you write your essay—work closely with the texts you select.
To
begin, look back over the semester’s reading list and pick 3-4 of your most
favorite authors and/or readings. Try
to “widen your net” to include authors or readings from at least two (2)
different time periods (1865-1914, 1914-1945, and 1945-Present) and from at
least two (2) different literary genres (novels, short stories, poems, plays).
Once
you have chosen your 3-4 writers and/or their works, examine your choices to see
what you can find: What drew you to them? What
similarities exist among the texts or authors?
What differences exist among the texts or authors?
Consider subject matter, characters, narrators, speakers, themes, plots,
symbols, writing style, etc. Your
goal should be to analyze and evaluate your preferences for literature, to
discover what attracts you to literature, to seek for what might not be apparent
or obvious at a first glance.
For
example, if I were to choose this essay option, I might begin by listing my
favorite readings from the semester: Henry James’ Daisy Miller: A Study, Robert Frost’s poetry, Willa Cather’s My
Antonia, and Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral.”
Next, I would reacquaint myself with the texts, possibly skimming them or
rereading selected sections. In
doing so, I would begin to make notes to myself about the above questions and
any other ideas I might think of. For
example, the first observation I might make is that Cather and Frost both deal
with rural settings and the people associated with those locales.
But, then, as I continue to think about it, Carver’s blue-collar
characters may also have some similarities to rural characters.
Henry James’ novella seems to be the “odd one out,” but since I
like the psychological realism of his writing, I could see if Cather and Carver
do the same thing in their fiction, or if there’s any psychological realism in
Frost’s poetry. And so on.
This may seem like a very easy, “creative” assignment, but don’t take it lightly. I will evaluate your essay with the same rigor that I would a more straightforward, “academic” essay—i.e. option #1. But, at the same time, be creative, be analytical, make “connections” that others might not or that others might not notice at a first glance. However, this advice is true of all essays—readers (including professors) look for creativity, analytical depth, and clear and coherent presentation of thoughts.
©2001 Scott Stankey / All rights reserved
Last revised on
October 29, 2007 by
Scott Stankey
Please address comments to Stankesc@an.cc.mn.us