Page
1
of2
Cart
t...1azawasic:.ma,
a Dakota
whose
ancestors
were exiled
from
Minnesota
,
watched
riders
enter
a Mankatc
park.
David Joles,
Stat"
T;ibunc
StarTribune
Article
by: CURT
BROWN Star
Tribune
August
11,
2012-
6:47
PM
A
150-year-old loop
of
rope
,
knotted
into
a
hangman's noose,
sits in
a
climate-controlled case
in
the
underground
archives
of the
Minnesota History
Center
in
St.
Paul.
Some
say
it
should
be
burned,
buried or
returned to the
hands of
the Dakota
people.
Others
argue it
should be
displayed
,
like
piles
of
shoes at
Holocaust
museums,
as
a
powerful artifact
to
help
people
confront
the
grim
story
of
the
U.S.-Dakota
War,
which erupted
in
Minnesota
in
1862 and
ended with the
largest mass
execution in
U.S. history.
The
noose, and
just
what
to
make of
it, is
one
sign
of
the
historical
reckoning looming
this year
as Minnesotans
wrestle with how
to mark
the 150th
anniversary
of
one
its
ugliest,
yet
often
overlooked
,
episodes.
"This
will
be
a very
challenging
year-
the
wounds
are
still
deep,"
said Republican
staie
Rep.
Dean
Urdahl,
a
longtime history teacher
whose
Grove
City home
is
three
miles
from where
the
war
broke
out.
His great-great-grandfather
buried
some
of
its first
victims.
"It
was
our
state's
greatest
tragedy."
Dozens
of commemorative
events are
planned, from
a
major
exhibit at
the Minnesota
History Center
to programs
in
classrooms
across
the
state
and
cellphone tours
along the
Minnesota River,
where the war
raged for
six
weeks.
Yet
,
in
the
shadow
of
it all
are deep
rifts over how
to
best observe
the war's
sesquicentennial.
Some
Dakota
believe artifacts
should
be
returned to
them,
and
that
Historic
Fort Snelling
should be
razed or
portrayed
as
a
concentration
camp
used
to punish
hundreds of
their ancestors
after
the
war
.
Meanwhile,
some
descendants of
the more
than
400
settlers
and
soldiers
killed
in the conflict
complained when early
brochures about
commemorative
cellphone
tours of
the area
hinted that
only Dakota elders'
voices would be
featured.
The
concerns
reflect
debates
evident
across
the country
over how
to provide
a more
complete
rendition
of
the past
at historic
sites
,
even
if
that
means
confronting
deeply
disturbing
events long
written
out
of the
historical narrative.
"You
can't
tum your
head from
what
is
not pretty
in
history
and,
whatever
we
do,
it's not
going
to
somehow
heal things
or
settle
it,"
said
Stephen
Elliott,
who
became
the director
of
the
Minnesota
Historical
Society last
May after
28 years
at
Colonial
Williamsburg.
He
was
among
those
who
decided
to
give
the role
of
African-Americans
and
slavery
greater
prominence at Williamsburg.
Five years
ago, a
similar
effort
led
to reconstruction
of a
slave
cabin at
Mount
Vernon
,
the
historic home
of George
Washington.
The
U.S.-Dakota
War
was
largely
overshadowed by
the Civil
War
raging
to
the
south.
But
the bloody
clash
left
a profound
legacy
on
the
then 4-year-old
state
of
Minnesota.
"I
would
hope
that average,
mainstream Minnesotans
would
take
this
moment to
pause and
wake
up
a little bit
to
the
truth
that
this
country
came
out
of
Indian
country
,"
said
Guy
Lopez,
a Dakota
from
Crow
Creek
,
S.D.,
who
now lives
in
Washington. 'What
happened
150
years
ago
wasn't
out
of
the blue
and
was
not
without
provocation."
The
year 1862
started
with
broken
promises and
starvation
for
the Dakota,
who
had
been pushed
into a narrow
strip
of
reservation
land
along
the
Minnesota
River. It
exploded
when
their despair
and anger
turned into
deadly attacks
on
settlers
in
August and
September. It
ended
with
the
December hanging
of
_38
Dakota warriors
in Mankato.
An
act of
Congress
then
banished thousands
of
Dakota
from Minnesota. The
law,
though
now unobserved
,
remains
on
the
books.
"In
a
situation
where
it's
so
contentious,
part of
what
we're
trying
to
address
through
this observance
is
how
we
can
be a
better
institution
in
tenms
of
our
relationship
with
the
Dakota,"
said Dan
Spack, director
of
the
history
center
museum.
But,
he added,
"we know
there
will
be
people
for whom
we
have
to be
a thing to
be
against."
For
the first
time, the
history
center
is
using
a
"truth
recovery
project" model
developed in
Northern Ireland,
which
Spack
said
features
outreach
to
gather
a
fuller
sense
of
what
happened,
"rather
than
assuming
all
we
have
to
do
is
sit down
,
do
some
research
and
cook
it
up
ourselves
."
Emotions
high in
the valley
The
Minnesota River
valley,
where
the war
unfolded, is
dotted with
living descendants
of
settlers
whose
family trees
wind back
to
1862. In
that area,
and among
the Dakota,
interest in
the war is
intense.
But
many Minnesotans
remain largely
unaware
of
the
tragic
story
.
"You
can get
through the
Minnesota
school
system
and
never hear
about the
Dakota conflict,
and
at
a
national
level people
are
completely clueless,"
said
Jessica
Potter,
the
director
of
the
Blue Earth
County Historical
Society
in
Mankato,
where
the
hangings took
place after
President
Abraham
Lincoln
signed
the
orders.
"Even
in
this
community,
we
have
major
community
leaders
who say:
'Lincoln was
involved, really?'"
Page
2
of2
Blue
Earth County's
collection includes
a wooden
beam reputed
to be
part of the
scaffolding from
which the
hanging ropes
dangled. It
remains out
of view
because of
questions about
its authenticity
.
John LaBatte
-
a New
Ulm descendant
of a
Dakota warrior,
a Dakota
who opposed
the war
and a
slain white
trader- will
lead battleground
tours this
summer and
is on
the state
historical society's
descendants advisory
panel. It
surprises him
how
deeply the
war still
resonates, noting
that it
took only
decades after
World
War
II for
the United
States to
develop friendly
relations with
Japan and
Germany.
But
that war
involved a
unified America
fighting
a
enemy on
foreign
soil, noted
Sasha Houston
Brown, academic
adviser for
indigenous students
at Minneapolis
Community and
Technical College
and a
Santee Sioux.
The other
was fought
in occupied
territory of
the Dakota
homeland. "All
this goes
againSt the
great American myth
of the
land of
the free
and the home
of the
brave. That
wasn't the
reality, and
it makes people
uncomfortable," Brown
said.
Among
the most
outspoken Dakota
critics of
the Minnesota
Historical Society's
practices is
Waziyatawin, who
lives in
the Upper
Sioux Community
near Granite
Falls and
holds a
Ph.D.
in history.
She insists
the historical
society "is
totally callous
to the concerns
of Dakota
people" and
thinks Fort
Snelling should
be torn
down or
returned because
it served
as a
concentration camp,
imprisoning
1,600
starving and
diseased Dakota
nearby in
the winter
of 1862-63.
She
is angry
that the
historical society's
collection includes
the noose, as
well as
dolls and
other items
soldiers collected
during punitive
raids following
the war.
"All these things
need to
be in Dakota
hands; they
have no
right to
them. It's
just another atrocity
that they
even have
these objects
taken off
the killing
fields....
The idea
that they
hold indigenous peoples'
things and
tell us it's
for the
public's good
is outrageous,"
she said.
Spack
insists state
historians are
trying to
be sensitive
to Dakota
concerns and
acknowledges problems
in the
historical society's
past. The
remains of
Dakota
leader
Little
Crow, in
the collection
for more
than a
century, were
finally turned
over in
1971 under pressure
and buried
in Flandreau,
S.D.
"We're
not in
the habit
of thinking
of our
activities as
being anything
other than
virtuous, so
when somebody
says, 'You shouldn't
have this,
it doesn't
belong to
you,' it
kind of cuts
to the
core or
our values,''
Spack said.
The
history center
invited Dakota
and settlers'
descendants to
join separate
panels to
respond to
plans for
the anniversary exhibit
and events.
They showed
the groups
the noose
and other
items this
month, but refused
a Star
Tribune request
to photograph
or see
it. They
plan not
to include
it when
the 1862
exhibit opens
this summer.
"Partly
out of
sensitivity to
the Dakota
people
,
we
feel strongly
that the
noose would
tend to
ove!Whelm the whole
story and it
would
just
become the
noose exhibit,"
Spack said.
"It would
detract from
what we
really want
people to
understand, which
is this
whole chain
of events
that leads
to this
war, and
if there's
culpability people
can see
it."
Darla
Gebhard, research
librarian at
the Brown
County Museum
in New
Ulm, is the
great-great-granddaughter of a
man who
defended New
Ulm from
Dakota attackers.
The noose,
she said,
should be
displayed because
"it reminds
us of what
a horrible
end there was
to the
war and
to deny
it and
not show those
pieces is
like you're
trying to
erase the
shame of
what happened." She
recalls the
shoes and
human hair
at the
U.S. Holocaust
Memorial Museum
in Washington--
"tell me
that wasn't
a riveting
experience"
.--
and thinks artifacts
are vital
to understanding
history.
The
noose that
killed Chaska
After
the war,
brief trials
led to
more than
300 Dakota
braves being
sentenced to die.
Lincoln cut
the list
to 39,
writing to
state leaders that
he was
"anxious to
not act with
so much clemency
as to
encourage another
outbreak ...
nor with
so much
severity as
to be real
cruelty."
A
last-minute reprieve
by the
state left
the list at
38. They
were hanged
the day
after Christmas
in Mankato. Among
them was
a man
named Chaska,
who experts
now agree
was mistakenly
executed. The
noose used
to hang
him is
the one
in the
historical society's
archives.
A
doctor's wife,
Sarah Wakefield,
had testified that
·chaska
protected her and
her children
when they
were taken
captive. But
Chaska wound
up on the
gallows anyway.
A soldier
named
J.K.
Arnold stole
the noose
right after the
hanging and hid
it for
seven years,
according to
his letter
in the
archives, violating
orders to
ship all
the nooses
to Washington.
"It's
sitting in
there as
a trophy
and we
want it
returned along
with the
other 37
nooses that
are somewhere
in Washington," said
Melvin Lee
Houston, 59,
of the Santee
reservation in
Lindy, Neb.
His
great-great-great-grandfather was
among
the
38
hanged and
his ancestors were
among thousands
of Dakota forced
out of
Minnesota.
He
hopes all
the nooses
will be
found and
given to
Dakota elders
this year
for a
Wiping of the
Tears ceremony.
History center
officials resist
giving up
artifacts,
saying
it's
their job
to protect
historical evidence,
such
as the
noose,for
future generations.
Rep.
Urdahl
has introduced
resolutions to
pardon Chaska
and to
urge Congress
to repeal
the Dakota
Exclusion Act.
Even those efforts
have aroused
controversy.
Waziyatawin and
some other
Dakota oppose
the pardon
as an
attempt to
"assuage white
guilt" by
clearing a
Dakota who
helped a
white woman
instead of
the other
37 hanged
warriors, who
she says
were patriotic
Minnesotans protecting
their
homeland from
intruders.
0
"There's
so much
division in
the Dakota
community," Brown
said. "It's
not about blaming
or shaming
or guilting.
Right now,
it's about allowing
the truth
through history
to be acknowledged
and recognized."
Curt
Brown •
612-673-4767
©
2015 Star
Tribune